Die Frage ist ob die USA es erlauben das Steuergerät in ein Französiches Flugzeug einzubauen?

Eine solche Detailfrage könnte zu einer europäischen Atombombe führen, wenn sich diesbezüglich F, D und B zusammen tun, weil durch den Jäger der nächsten Generation zwischen F und D die USA es nicht mehr zulassen und B mit der Rafale auch nicht mehr dürfen... Ob die USA das wollen? Damit würde eine Abhängigkeit von den USA weg fallen...

Artikel 3
(1) Die Regierungen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik bekräftigen ihren Verzicht auf Herstellung und Besitz von und auf Verfügungsgewalt über atomare, biologische und chemische Waffen. Sie erklären, daß auch das vereinte Deutschland sich an diese Verpflichtungen halten wird. Insbesondere gelten die Rechte und Verpflichtungen aus dem Vertrag über die Nichtverbreitung von Kernwaffen vom 1. Juli 1968 für das vereinte Deutschland fort.

Artikel 5
(bzlg. ehem. DDR-Gebiet)
Ausländische Streitkräfte und Atomwaffen oder deren Träger werden in diesem Teil Deutschlands weder stationiert noch dorthin verlegt.

Eine solche Detailfrage könnte zu einer europäischen Atombombe führen, wenn sich diesbezüglich F, D und B zusammen tun, weil durch den Jäger der nächsten Generation zwischen F und D die USA es nicht mehr zulassen und B mit der Rafale auch nicht mehr dürfen... Ob die USA das wollen? Damit würde eine Abhängigkeit von den USA weg fallen...

Die Frage ist eher, ob die Franzosen bereit sind, die Technologie der Rafale gegenüber den Amerikanern vollständig offenzulegen. Ich sehe übrigens beim EF das gleiche Problem.
Das "B61" - Ding ist bei den Belgiern entweder ein Nice-to-have oder als Must-have der Steigbügelhalter, um die F-35 zu beschaffen, weil es die Mitbewerberpositionen von Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH und Dassault Aviation verschlechtert.

Ich wollte gerade schreiben, dass dies rechtlich entsprechend dem Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag gar nicht möglich sei aber so genau scheint der Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag anscheinend nicht mehr genommen zu werden. Siehe z.B. aktuell https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Darf-Deuts...en-3766695.html
Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag nochmal nachgelesen:

Pilot Dies in 'Classified' Plane Crash at Nevada Training Range
Offenbar will die AirForce nicht bekanntgeben, um welchen Flugzeugtypen es sich gehandelt hat.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/09...ning-range.html

Mysterious Air Force Crash Reportedly Involved a Foreign Plane

The pilot was likely evaluating a foreign fighter, such as a Russian Sukhoi jet.

[...]

However, sources tell Aviation Week that the pilot involved in the crash, Lt. Col. Eric Schultz, was a squadron commander of an Air Force unit that tests and evaluates foreign aircraft. If this is the case, the most likely explanation is that Schultz was piloting a foreign jet at the time of the crash.

Airmen who flight test foreign military planes, sometimes called Red Hats, are part of an unnumbered unit within Detachment 3 of the 53rd Test and Evaluation Group, stationed out of Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada. A press release from Nellis indicates that the aircraft involved in the incident belonged to Air Force Material Command, which oversees Detachment 3 of the 53rd. Flight testing foreign jets was previously conducted by the 413th Flight Test Squadron and the 4477th Test and Evaluation Squadron before that.

These units have been known to operate a variety of Russian-built fighter aircraft, including the MiG-29 and several jets built by Russian aviation contractor Sukhoi. The Su-27 air superiority fighter, for example, was spotted flying over the Nevada Test and Training Range this past January.

The exact aircraft type involved in the crash is still unknown, though it could be an Su-27 or possibly even the newer Su-30 multirole fighter, which Russia has sold to multiple U.S. allies such as Indonesia and Vietnam. Evaluating Russian aircraft has become a priority for the U.S. Air Force these days, as aerial encounters between the two militaries over Syria and the Baltics have become more common.

[...]

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a...reign-aircraft/

Weiß Du etwas zur Rollenverteilung der drei Flugzeugtypen bei Katar?

Swiss considering F-35 amid plan for 40 new jets

Swiss authorities are relaunching their fighter acquisition programme since the 2014 referendum scuppered the last effort

09/18/2017

On 6 September, Swiss Defence Minister Guy Parmelin presented the Bundesrat (the Swiss Governmental Ministerial Council) with a proposal for the complete replacement of the Swiss Air Force's (SwAF's) 26 F-5E/Fs and 31 F/A-18C/Ds.

The plan foresees the replacement of both aircraft types to begin in 2023, in addition to the SwAF's current 35mm Oerlikon anti-aircraft artillery and Rapier surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) with a new ground based air defence system (known as Bodengestützte Luftverteidigung or BODLUV).

[...]

While a SwAF evaluation commission for the new combat aircraft – currently dubbed the NKF (Neues Kampfflugzeug) – have met with external experts 14 times since April 2016, several approaches to the acquisition remain under deliberation.

An internal 200-page report seen by Defence IQ seems to support an option of 30 new combat aircraft plus the GBAD system. However, Parmelin has pushed instead for a “more realistic” solution, aimed at appeasing both military and political parties. The most expensive option meanwhile cited 55-70 fighters and long-range SAMs for around $15-18bn.

[...]

A government spokesman said the Bundesrat would probably decide later this year on the launch date for a Request for Proposals (RFP) providing it receives a satisfactory answer to its questions.

According to the MoD, the RFP will be sent to Saab for the Gripen-E/F; Airbus for Typhoon (probably with the Tranche 3 with active electronically scanned array radar); Dassault for Rafale (probably the F4 version); Boeing for the F-18E/F (probably the Super Hornet Advanced) and Lockheed Martin for the F-35.

[...]

https://www.defenceiq.com/news/swiss-consid...for-40-new-jets

UAE wants to buy over a squadron of Su-35 advanced fighter jets from Russia

October 03

The relevant contract may be signed by the yearend, if the ndegotiations are successful, the source said

http://tass.com/defense/968593

Remplacement des F-16: la France n’a pas répondu dans les règles à l’appel d’offres

4/10/2017

Selon le ministre de la Défense Steven Vandeput, « aucune offre de prix et aucune réponse n’a été transmise par la France aux questions attendues dans le cadre de l’appel d’offre ».

http://www.lesoir.be/117550/article/2017-1...lappel-doffres#

Frankreich ist mit seinem "Spezialangebot" bei der belgischen F-16-Nachfolger-Beschaffung raus, es entsprach nicht den Ausschreibungsformalien:

Wer ist denn noch im Rennen? Eurofighter und F-35?

Canada cements interest in Australian Hornets

09 October, 2017

Canada has formally expressed interest in Australia’s used Boeing F/A-18A/B Hornets, marking a significant development in the Royal Canadian Air Force’s search for a fighter that could temporarily fill the CF-18’s mission.

Last month, Canadian defence minister Harjit Sajjan expressed interest in Australia’s Hornet fleet. On 29 September, Canada submitted a formal declaration known as an expression of interest to Australia. Canada expects a response by the end of 2017 with details on the aircraft’s cost and availability, according to a 9 October release from the Canadian government.

After Lockheed Martin’s F-35 fell out of favor with Liberals and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Canada pursued Boeing’s F/A-18 Super Hornets as an interim fix. But the government suspended talks with Boeing after the company’s commercial arm accused Canadian manufacturer Bombardier of dumping its CSeries jet onto the US market, prompting a US Department of Commerce investigation to determine if the company received unfair subsidies from the Canadian government.

[...]

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/...hornets-441980/

Plan to buy used fighter jets from Australia far from straightforward, experts say

'If the government of the U.S. didn't want the aircraft to be sold, it would be very difficult to get them'
Canada's plan to shop for used Australian fighter jets rather than buy new Boeing Super Hornets may backfire, according to defence experts, because the U.S. government will ultimately have a say on whether a deal proceeds.
Even though the FA-18 Hornets are nearly three decades old, require regular corrosion maintenance and are nearing obsolescence, their proposed resale would still require Washington's approval because they are advanced warplanes, originally manufactured in the U.S., a former Royal Australian Air Force officer told CBC News.

[...]

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/politics/canad...-jets-1.4354326