RAM Flugkörpersystem |
Willkommen, Gast ( Anmelden | Registrierung )
RAM Flugkörpersystem |
21. Nov 2008, 17:21 | Beitrag
#1
|
|
Grenadier Beiträge: 4 Gruppe: Members Mitglied seit: 27.09.2008 |
inspiriert von der letzten 2 WK Dokumentation " das Ende der Schlachtschiffe" schaute ich mir mal an, was es heutzutage an Flugabwehrsystemen gibt.
http://www.danmil.de/RAM.pdf Das RAM Flugkörpersystem hört sich ja fast schon überwältigend an. 95% Trefferwahrscheinlichkeit gegen ankommende Rakete, auf einer anderen Seite las ich etwas von 102% bei Abschuss von 2 Raketen. Wie ist das in der Praxis zu sehen? Das ist ja fast schon "Gottgleich" für so ein System. Wieso dann überhaupt noch Flugzeug oder Raketenangriffe gegen Schiffe starten? Was spricht dagegen, solche Systeme auf auf Land, oder gar auf Flugzeugen einzusetzen? |
|
|
7. May 2013, 17:26 | Beitrag
#2
|
|
Major Beiträge: 8.338 Gruppe: Members Mitglied seit: 25.10.2009 |
US Congressional Research Service, Navy Shipboard Lasers for Surface, Air, and
Missile Defense: Background and Issues for Congress (Ronald O'Rourke): ZITAT Although these perspectives differ somewhat, the following conclusions might be drawn from the table regarding approximate laser power levels needed to affect certain targets: • Lasers with a power level of about 10 kW might be able to counter some UAVs at short range, particularly “soft” UAVs (i.e., those with design features that make them particularly susceptible to laser damage). • Lasers with power levels in the tens of kilowatts could have more capability for countering UAVs, and could counter at least some small boats as well. • Lasers with a power level of about 100 kW would have a greater ability for countering UAVs and small boats, as well as some capability for countering rockets, artillery, and mortars. • Lasers with power levels in the hundreds of kilowatts could have greater ability for countering targets mentioned above, and could also counter manned aircraft and some missiles. • Lasers with power levels in the megawatts could have greater ability for countering targets mentioned above—including supersonic ASCMs and ballistic missiles—at ranges of up to about 10 nautical miles. In addition to the points above, one Navy briefing stated that lasers with power levels above 300 kW could permit a ship to defend not only itself, but other ships in the area as well (a capability referred to as area defense or escort operations or battle group operations). Angedacht sind insbesondere: - 35-100 kW Laser für Phalanx (Laser Weapon System "LaWS" als CIWS) - 10 kW Laser für 25mm Kanone (Tactial Laser System "TLS" für Mark 38) Benötigte Infrastruktur: ZITAT Required ship power (in kW or MW) and cooling capacity (in tons)
• 60-100kW Laser: <400 kW and 68 tons • 300-500kW Laser: <2.5MW and 560 tons • > 1 MW Laser: ~10-20 MW and ~1,400 tons Power and cooling requirements assume continuous firing of the laser with a 67% duty cycle (i.e., the laser is firing 67% of the time). Der Beitrag wurde von Merowinger bearbeitet: 7. May 2013, 18:59 |
|
|
Vereinfachte Darstellung | Aktuelles Datum: 27. September 2024 - 04:56 |