F-15X für die USAF, Warum nicht einfach mehr F-35? |
Willkommen, Gast ( Anmelden | Registrierung )
F-15X für die USAF, Warum nicht einfach mehr F-35? |
12. Mar 2019, 21:05 | Beitrag
#1
|
|
Feldwebel Beiträge: 327 Gruppe: Members Mitglied seit: 14.09.2016 |
Die F-15X soll lt Budget 2020 kommen, 8 Stück für 2020 von insgesamt geplanten 144
https://www.defensenews.com/video/2019/03/1...defense-budget/ |
|
|
24. Mar 2019, 13:19 | Beitrag
#2
|
|
Oberstleutnant Beiträge: 15.459 Gruppe: VIP Mitglied seit: 13.01.2005 |
ZITAT EDITORIAL: Fighter Math
April 2019 Tobias Naegele Editor in Chief An F-15 will never be an F-35. Today’s Air Force has too few squadrons, people, and planes to meet the requirements demanded by our National Defense Strategy, and the Pentagon’s 2020 budget request doesn’t do enough to address the shortfall. [...] The reason this is a hot topic today is that current F-15Cs will be 44 years old in 2030. They can’t make it that long. But buying the F-15EX—a “new, old airplane”—is hardly the solution. That’s a 30-year fix to a 10-year problem. The wiser course is to buy more F-35s more quickly. Instead of a short-term solution that presents a new long-term liability, accelerating the shift to 5th generation aircraft improves the long-term outlook for the fighter fleet. [...] Critics will counter that stealth is expensive and the cost of operating low-observable aircraft remains too high. That’s only true if you look at airplanes as one-for-one replacements. In reality, stealth reduces the number of aircraft needed to accomplish the same mission. 1 F-35A ≠ 1 F-15EX When one plane can do the job of six or eight or 12—depending on the mission—the cost per desired effect declines precipitously. That single plane, pilot, and maintainer crew will never be as costly as the dozen legacy aircraft and all the people needed to support them. [...] The difference between the Air Force “we have” and the Air Force “we need” boils down to this: The Air Force needs 72 new fighters a year to sustain a lethal, fighting force. Until something better is developed, the F-35 is the best plane for the money. Expressed mathematically, we can say unequivocally: F-35 > F-15EX Fortunately, the Pentagon does not get the final word. Congress has a chance to do the right thing: Say, “no” to F-15EX. Say, “yes” to more F-35s. http://www.airforcemag.com/MagazineArchive...ghter-Math.aspx Der Beitrag wurde von Dave76 bearbeitet: 24. Mar 2019, 13:55 -------------------- "avenidas/avenidas y flores/flores/flores y mujeres/avenidas/avenidas y mujeres/avenidas y flores y mujeres y/un admirador" - Eugen Gomringer
"Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying." - Arthur C. Clarke Proud member of Versoffener Sauhaufen™! #natoforum |
|
|
Vereinfachte Darstellung | Aktuelles Datum: 19. April 2024 - 17:48 |