Willkommen, Gast ( Anmelden | Registrierung )

Zurück zum Board Index
94 Seiten V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Entwicklungen und News in der Luftfahrt, Teil 2
General Gauder
Beitrag 5. Nov 2010, 20:28 | Beitrag #181
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 11.578



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 01.10.2005


wäre es eigentlich eine Alternative anstelle der F35 die Rafale auf den Trägern zu betreiben?
Mal von der Schanze abgesehen.

General Gauder
 
Warhammer
Beitrag 5. Nov 2010, 23:40 | Beitrag #182
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Major
Beiträge: 5.414



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 15.10.2002


Da die neuen Träger der Briten nun doch mit Katapulten gebaut werden kann man da jeden CATOBAR Flieger draufsetzen. Sprich anstatt der nun projektierten F-35C könnten da auch Rafales und Super Hornets von starten.

Vielleicht wäre das auch gar nicht blöd. Die Briten sagen zu Rafales statt der F-35 zu kaufen und dafür nehmen die Franzosen den Briten einen der Träger ab. Man kann dann immer noch einen dritten bauen und hat erstmal nicht so einen Riesendruck auf dem aktuellen Budget. Das Loch ohne Trägerfliegerei bei der Royal Navy wird dadurch auch kleiner.

Von der Planung ist das bei der Royal Navy aber sowieso dubios. Nicht genug, dass man diese neuen Träger, die ja nunmal ziemliche Brocken für RN Verhältnisse sind, praktisch Zeitgleich bestellt hat, solche Spielereien wie Astute SSNs und Daring DDGs kommen auch noch zur gleichen Zeit. Und alles Goldrandlösungen die echt teuer in der Anschaffung sind.


--------------------
(\__/)
(O.o )
(> < ) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination!
 
Black Hawk
Beitrag 6. Nov 2010, 08:32 | Beitrag #183
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Hauptmann
Beiträge: 2.650



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 25.10.2002


http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/...-into-2011.html

Laut Boeing wird die Entscheidung über einen CSAR-Heli für die BW auf das erste Quartal 2011 verschoben. Grund hierfür seien "interne Prozesse" (Ich nehme an im BMVg)


--------------------
Was mach ich hier?
 
Hummingbird
Beitrag 10. Nov 2010, 14:53 | Beitrag #184
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 14.062



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 03.12.2004


ZITAT
Bell Helicopter and U.S. Army Sign Cooperative

Agreement to Develop Drive System Technologies

Press Contact
Bill Schroeder
(817) 280-7651 (office) or (817) 600-4209 (mobile)
wschroeder@bellhelicopter.textron.com

FORT WORTH, TEXAS (November 8, 2010) - Bell Helicopter, a Textron Inc. company (NYSE: TXT) and the U.S. Army Aviation Applied Technology Directorate have signed a $30 million Technology Investment Agreement to develop state-of-the-art drive system technology under the Future Advanced Rotorcraft Drive System (FARDS) program. rofl.gif rofl.gif rofl.gif xyxthumbs.gif

The FARDS program is focused on critical performance and affordability enhancing drive system technologies for the U.S. Army's Current/Future Force fleet of rotorcraft, as well as commercial rotorcraft. The program is targeting a 55 percent improvement in drive system power-to-weight ratio, a 35 percent reduction in production, operating and support costs, 90 percent automatic detection of critical failures and an 18 decibel reduction in drive system-generated noise.

"FARDS is a great opportunity to develop key technologies to serve as the foundation of a rotorcraft drive system for the year 2015 and beyond," said Ryan Ehinger, Bell Helicopter program manager for FARDS. "Drive systems are a core technology at Bell Helicopter, and we are proud to focus on enhanced capabilities for those whose livelihoods depend on our products."

The agreement, worked through Bell's Xworx organization, brings together a diverse group of subcontractors with unique expertise in the fields of materials, processing, heat transfer, diagnostics and more, complementing Bell's design and manufacturing strengths.

The five year FARDS program will develop more than 18 new technologies resulting in full scale demonstrations of a main rotor gearbox and tail rotor driveshaft system.

"The goals are challenging, but it will be exciting to see how the results of this collaboration transition to the commercial and military product lines," Ehinger said. "We are looking forward to contributing to this important initiative."
http://www.bellhelicopter.com/en/company/p...vDrvSysTech.cfm
 
LoneWolf
Beitrag 21. Nov 2010, 17:00 | Beitrag #185
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberleutnant
Beiträge: 2.183



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 22.02.2006


FR Online: Fehler bei der Air Force

ZITAT
Die Air Force habe durch einen «Beamtenfehler» beide Konkurrenten versehentlich mit Details über die Offerte des jeweils anderen versorgt, berichteten US-Medien am Samstag.


--------------------
There are two constants in the universe:
the speed of Light and the bore of a Chevy Small Block
 
Praetorian
Beitrag 2. Dec 2010, 20:54 | Beitrag #186
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Konteradmiral
Beiträge: 20.508



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 06.08.2002


Nachdem er ja schon im Bilderthread aufgetaucht ist, hier noch die zugehörige News dazu - der zweite überarbeitete Prototyp des Mil Mi-38 hatte heute seinen Erstflug:

ZITAT
OP-2, the second prototype of the new Mi-38 helicopter built by Moscow Mil Helicopter Plant JSC and Kazan Helicopters JSC, the subsidiaries of the Russian Helicopters holding company, has achieved its first flight. The test program that was started is proceeding well according to Kazan Helicopters specialists: the helicopter has already completed 26 ground runups and 7 hover and low speed flights over the runway.
The design of the machine undergoing flight tests was modified pursuant to the results of tests on the first Mi-38 prototype - the OP-1. The hydraulic and fuel systems have been upgraded and some changes have been made to the main rotor blades. The helicopter control system now has spring feel mechanisms of type design. As a result the helicopter is in maximum compliance with the Russian airworthiness regulations AP-29, a counterpart of FAR-29. Its handling and stability have improved. It is equipped with Pratt & Whitney Canada PW 127/TS engines and the modern Tranzas IBKV-38 avionics suite with a glass cockpit. The helicopter can also be equipped with Russian TV7-117V engines. The Mi-38 OP-2 is scheduled to be handed over to Moscow Mil Helicopter Plant for the full flight test cycle.
Moscow Mil Helicopter Plant is planning to demonstrate the Mi-38 OP-2 helicopter in 2011. Mass production at Kazan Helicopters is scheduled for 2013. The third prototype of the Mi-38 is in assembly in Kazan.
The medium multi-role cargo and transport Mi-38 is designed for passenger transportation (including VIP flights), carrying loads in the cabin and on an external sling, search and rescue, offshore, and flying hospital operations. According to design specifications, the Mi-38 will have a high payload and top speed. The Mi-38 will have a spacious passenger cabin and highly efficient engines. The labour constant for service and maintenance may be reduced thanks to a built-in automated equipment and engine serviceability control system.
The Mi-38 is a new generation helicopter that can perform up to the highest safety and comfort standards for helicopters in its class.

Pressemeldung Russian Helicopters JSC

[Anmerkung: Daß er überhaupt nach FAR29-Äquivalent zugelassen werden soll, ist schon bemerkenswert - aber es wäre schön zu erfahren, nach welcher Ausgabe. Die FAR29 gibt es seit 1965... rolleyes.gif )


--------------------
This just in: Beverly Hills 90210 - Cleveland Browns 3
 
Hummingbird
Beitrag 2. Dec 2010, 22:32 | Beitrag #187
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 14.062



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 03.12.2004


Ernsthaft? Selbstverständlich nach der aktuell gültigen von 2008.

http://www.easa.europa.eu/ws_prod/g/doc/Ag...202%20final.pdf
 
Praetorian
Beitrag 3. Dec 2010, 00:46 | Beitrag #188
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Konteradmiral
Beiträge: 20.508



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 06.08.2002


Hast du dazu eine Quelle?


--------------------
This just in: Beverly Hills 90210 - Cleveland Browns 3
 
Hummingbird
Beitrag 3. Dec 2010, 01:12 | Beitrag #189
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 14.062



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 03.12.2004


Es gibt keine unterschiedlichen Versionen von den Federal Aviation Regulations. Nur die aktuell gültige. Was 1965 mal war spielt heute keine Rolle mehr.
 
Praetorian
Beitrag 3. Dec 2010, 01:46 | Beitrag #190
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Konteradmiral
Beiträge: 20.508



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 06.08.2002


1965 nicht, aber ggf. grandfathering via Mi-38 OP-1.
Auch: Entspricht diese ominöse russische AP-29 unmittelbar den neuesten Amendments der FAR29?

Ich hab da nämlich meine Zweifel, daß die Maschine insbesondere die Crashstandards der neuesten FAR29 erfüllen kann.


--------------------
This just in: Beverly Hills 90210 - Cleveland Browns 3
 
Hummingbird
Beitrag 3. Dec 2010, 18:40 | Beitrag #191
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 14.062



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 03.12.2004


Was in diesen russischen AP-29 genau drin steht weiß ich auch nicht. Ich interpretiere die Intention der Russen aber so das sie die Mi-38 nach aktuellen westlichen Standards zertifizieren wollen um Zugang zum europäischen und amerikanischen Zivilmarkt zu erhalten. Alles andere würde jedenfalls keinen Sinn machen weil sich keiner für irgendwelche russischen Gummiparagraphen interessiert.

Die FAR-29 (US Vorschrift) wurde mit den letzten Amandements der JAR-29 (EU Vorschrift) angepasst, bzw. der EASA CS-29 die ich oben verlinkt habe. Was da drin steht sind keine wahnwitzig hohen Hürden. Wenn Sikorsky bei der Vermarktung des S-92 geschrieben hat das er der einzige ist der nach diesen Standards zugelassen ist, dann ist das lediglich so zu verstehen das zum Zeitpunkt des Inkrafttretens lediglich der S-92 zugelassen wurde und kein anderes Muster. Die crashworthiness der S-92 Zelle basiert übrigens auf mil-spec und nicht auf CS-29. Von daher sagt das alles nichts aus über die universelle crashworthiness des Mi-38.

Zwischen Anmeldung zur Zulassung und der Zulassung dürfen nicht mehr als 5 Jahre liegen. Wird dieser Zeitrahmen nicht eingehalten, dann werden Amendments gültig die zwischenzeitlich dazugekommen sind.



 
Desert Hawk
Beitrag 4. Dec 2010, 03:34 | Beitrag #192
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Elder Forenmen
Beiträge: 6.382



Gruppe: Ehrenmoderator
Mitglied seit: 05.08.2001


ZITAT
03.12.2010

Dänemark interessiert an Seahawk

Die Regierung Dänemarks zieht den Kauf von MH-69 R Seahwak Hubschraubern in Betracht, um die veraltete Lynx-Flotte zu ersetzen.


Sikorsky MH-60 R

Wie die Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) am 30. November bekannt gab hätte Dänemark Interesse an etwa 12 Maschinen des genannten Typs geäußert. Der Wert der Bestellung wird auf etwa 2 Billionen US-Dollar beziffert. Die Hubschrauber sollen in erster Linie zur U-Boot-Überwachung und im Bedarfsfall zur Landesverteidigung genutzt werden.

http://www.rotorblatt.de/news/detail.php?c...;objectID=1847#


Ich hoffe mal bei dem Wert der Bestellung handelt es sich um einen Tippfehler. biggrin.gif


--------------------
"Klagt nicht, kämpft !"
"Real power can't be given, it must be taken" (The Godfather)

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
 
Dave76
Beitrag 4. Dec 2010, 11:53 | Beitrag #193
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 15.459



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 13.01.2005


ZITAT(Desert Hawk @ 4. Dec 2010, 03:34) *
[...]Ich hoffe mal bei dem Wert der Bestellung handelt es sich um einen Tippfehler. biggrin.gif

Höchstwahrscheinlich ein relativ banaler Übersetzungsfehler, im US-amerikanischen entspricht billion der deutschen Milliarde.

Der Beitrag wurde von Dave76 bearbeitet: 4. Dec 2010, 11:53


--------------------
"avenidas/avenidas y flores/flores/flores y mujeres/avenidas/avenidas y mujeres/avenidas y flores y mujeres y/un admirador" - Eugen Gomringer
"Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying." - Arthur C. Clarke
Proud member of Versoffener Sauhaufen™!
#natoforum
 
Praetorian
Beitrag 4. Dec 2010, 12:52 | Beitrag #194
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Konteradmiral
Beiträge: 20.508



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 06.08.2002


Von den offensichtlichen Fehlern des Artikels abgesehen - es stehen noch einige andere Muster mit dem Seahawk im Wettbewerb (siehe Beitrag #141).
Das ist jetzt erstmal nur eine nicht bindende Voranmeldung eines möglichen Kaufes von US-Rüstungsgütern, damit nach einer entsprechenden Auswahlentscheidung nicht unnötig Zeit verloren geht.


--------------------
This just in: Beverly Hills 90210 - Cleveland Browns 3
 
Desert Hawk
Beitrag 12. Dec 2010, 17:21 | Beitrag #195
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Elder Forenmen
Beiträge: 6.382



Gruppe: Ehrenmoderator
Mitglied seit: 05.08.2001


ZITAT
RAF Dropping to 6 Fast-Jet Units
Export Deals Could Further Cut Typhoon Force

LONDON - Britain may halve its fast-jet fleet by 2020 or so, according to the commanding officer of the Royal Air Force's No. 1 Group.


A British Royal Air Force Typhoon F2 flies in close formation with a RAF Tornado F3. (Courtesy of U.K. Ministry of Defence)

"We are heading for five Typhoon squadrons and one JSF [Joint Strike Fighter] squadron," said Air Vice-Marshal Greg Bagwell, who commands the RAF's air combat group. "It will be a six-squadron world; that's what's on the books."
Related Topics

That could mean 107 Typhoons, plus about 40 F-35C JSFs that support a large operational squadron of 20 to 25 crews, Bagwell said.

Typhoon numbers could be clipped even further if Britain and Oman seal a deal to send the Persian Gulf nation about a squadron's worth of aircraft. The planes could be diverted from an existing RAF order; the question is whether they will then later be replaced, he said.

In 1990, the RAF had 33 fast-jet squadrons; in 2003, 17. Today, the number stands at 12: seven Tornado, three Typhoon and two Harrier squadrons, plus the offensive firepower of a growing fleet of Reaper UAVs.

By April, Britain will be down to eight fast-jet squadrons, thanks to the retirement of the Harriers and the shelving of two Tornado units.

The Tornado force has already been eroded by a covert 2009 order from the previous Labour administration to cut the number of crews in each squadron. But that number is expected to return to its previous level next year as squadrons are eliminated and crews shift around.

Those cuts, and others, were ordered by an October decision to ax defense spending over the next four years as part of a wider government plan to reduce public borrowing levels. The cuts bit deep into RAF capabilities; other reductions hit battlefield surveillance, maritime reconnaissance, helicopter transport and other capabilities.

"Six squadrons is the low point for the U.K.'s fast jet fleet," one analyst said. "You can expect that to recover a little as the Ministry of Defence bolsters its force of Joint Strike Fighters beyond the current level mandated in the new strategic defense and security review."

Bagwell was less sanguine. He called the first JSF squadron a "start point" and said more may come, but for the moment, "I expect a single squadron in 2020 and that's it."

Other senior RAF officers have said they aim eventually to operate around 100 F-35Cs, which will split their time operating from land bases and from the new Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers being built for the Royal Navy.

Bagwell said the fast-jet cuts were challenging but manageable so long as the RAF is not tasked to do much more than its current deployments: Tornados to the NATO effort in Afghanistan, and Typhoons to quick reaction alert (QRA) forces in Britain and the Falkland Islands.

"Am I happy to be down at that number [eight squadrons] next April? No, it worries the hell out of me because it's a small combat air force," he said. "I can just about do Op Herrick [Afghanistan] and the QRAs. Can I do other things? Yes, but it is at risk.

"Actually, I am more worried about what other people think I can do tomorrow," he said. "The whole thing about procurement and posture is as much about long-term future deterrence and keeping the enemy on the back foot as it is about physically fighting. The deterrence and coercive effect of air power has somehow got lost in the noise."
Typhoon Questions

Bagwell said the RAF would likely ax its 55 Tranche 1 Typhoons by mid-decade because it would cost too much to bring them up to the required multirole standards offered by Tranche 2 and Tranche 3. That would mean the RAF Typhoon fleet would top out at 107 machines.

But the Typhoon fleet could shrink even further, Bagwell said.

The "great unknown in the plans is the awful lot of potential export customers," he said.

The proposed deal with Oman is in the final stages of negotiation; discussions are now underway about where those dozen or so aircraft might come from. The RAF's Typhoon force could fall further if the planes are diverted from the Air Force's order and are not replaced.

Difficulties in Britain's 72-plane sale to Saudi Arabia are creating more uncertainty. The first 24 are being diverted from the RAF's Tranche 2 order, and the service is to get more Tranche 3 aircraft instead. The other 48 are to be assembled in Saudi Arabia as part of an effort to build up local industry.

But industry sources said the plan has run into difficulties that raise questions about how Britain will fill the Saudi order.

Bagwell said options could include taking additional aircraft from the RAF production run and replacing them later.

"Should we get the buybacks out of Saudi Arabia and Oman as planned, we will be back to the number of Typhoons I need," he said. "At the moment, if I don't get the [Omani] buyback and this is under discussion ... it could take me down to 95 aircraft."

He said any changes to RAF deliveries would affect the service's ability to train crews.

A spokesman for BAE Systems, which is helping to build the aircraft, said he couldn't comment on Saudi issues.

Bagwell also revealed:

■ The 2011 planning round could change the timing of the upgrade of Typhoon jets to a full multirole aircraft. Dubbed the Future Capabilities Program 2, it will allow the jets to carry Storm Shadow, Brimstone and other weapons.

■ The decision to switch the planned purchase of short-takeoff, vertical-landing F-35Bs to the conventional carrier C version will give the Air Force a true deep-penetration capability.

■ The Sentinel R1 surveillance capability, to be axed by the government after the Afghanistan war, could be replaced through programs like the Scavenger UAV and new active electronically scanned array radars on Typhoon and JSF.

■ The 2011 planning round may speed up creation of the final two Typhoon squadrons, now slated for 2015, by as much as a year.

Bagwell told reporters that the date on which the RAF hits six squadrons would depend in part on Ministry of Defence decisions about the drawdown of the Tornado strike aircraft as Typhoons arrive.

"We still need to hold on to a portion of the Tornado force, and it will be a very important decision for the next defense review [expected in 2015] as to how the crossover is achieved between Typhoon and Tornado," he said. "My gut instinct is that we will need at least two or three Tornado squadrons at the 2017 point, keeping the squadron numbers at the six to eight figure."

The Tornado fleet is currently scheduled to retire in 2021. The government recently announced a reduction in the number of Tornados required to sustain ongoing operations, known as force elements, from 40 to 18 by 2015.

Elizabeth Quintana, head of air power and technology at the Royal United Services Institute, said she didn't think air power suffered worse in the cuts than many other sectors.

"The benefit is that unlike the Army [spared the worst of the cuts due to the war in Afghanistan], the Air Force now knows what its configuration is going to look like in the 2017-2020 timeframe," she said. "Where aircraft numbers are going in the future and what impact unmanned combat air vehicles might have is too early to say. F-35 and Typhoon give you more capable platforms but with fewer numbers."

She noted that synthetic training will reduce the number of aircraft kept off the front lines.

Quelle: http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=521...c=AIR&s=TOP


--------------------
"Klagt nicht, kämpft !"
"Real power can't be given, it must be taken" (The Godfather)

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
 
Praetorian
Beitrag 14. Dec 2010, 23:57 | Beitrag #196
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Konteradmiral
Beiträge: 20.508



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 06.08.2002


Das BWB hat den 600. und damit letzten KEPD Taurus für die Luftwaffe übernommen.


--------------------
This just in: Beverly Hills 90210 - Cleveland Browns 3
 
Hummingbird
Beitrag 16. Dec 2010, 13:28 | Beitrag #197
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 14.062



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 03.12.2004


ZITAT
Russia to start Mi-38 production in 2013 after PW127 engine supply resolved
By

Russian Helicopters says it will begin production of the Mi-38 utility transport helicopter in 2013, after resolving engine supply issues with Pratt & Whitney Canada.

"The company plans to equip the helicopters with both Russian and Canadian engines. We see it as an additional advantage for our buyers. Partners in Russia and the CIS states traditionally opt for Russian-made engines, while partners worldwide may prefer Canadian," the firm says.

The Mi-38 programme has been beset by delays almost from its inception, when it was initially started in collaboration with Eurocopter.

Russian Helicopters' Mil Moscow Helicopter Plant said last year that production of the new-generation helicopter would begin no earlier than in 2014, after P&WC, initially chosen as the preferred engine supplier with the PW127/TS turboshaft, prevaricated over involvement in the project.

Russian Helicopters claimed that P&WC's reluctance to supply its engines was due to US political pressure following an embargo on sales of dual-purpose equipment to Russia.

P&WC had not replied to requests for comment on the situation as of 6 December. In May 2009, the company said it was "still in discussions with the client [Russian Helicopters] in a bid to resolve the issue."

OP-2, the second Mi-38 prototype, has made its first test flight after completing 26 ground runs and seven hover and low-speed flights over the runway.

The second prototype, powered by the PW127/TS, was modified following tests on the first Mi-38, with upgraded hydraulic and fuel systems, a spring-feel mechanism in the control system and some changes to the main rotor blades. The machine is now fully compliant with Russian AP-29 airworthiness regulations, equivalent to FAR-29. The aircraft is also fitted with a Russian-made Tranzas IBKV-38 avionics suite with a glass cockpit.

Russian Helicopters' Mil Moscow Helicopter Plant plans to demonstrate the OP-2 in 2011. A third prototype Mi-38 is under construction at the company's Kazan Helicopters Plant in the Russian republic of Tatarstan.

The twin-engine Mi-38 can carry up to 30 passengers, or a 5t payload, and can be used for civilian and military purposes.
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/...ine-supply.html
 
Praetorian
Beitrag 18. Dec 2010, 16:36 | Beitrag #198
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Konteradmiral
Beiträge: 20.508



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 06.08.2002


Kleiner Rundumschlag zum Auftakt des Wochenendes:



--------------------
This just in: Beverly Hills 90210 - Cleveland Browns 3
 
KSK
Beitrag 19. Dec 2010, 14:33 | Beitrag #199
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Major
Beiträge: 6.046



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 17.12.2002


ZITAT(Praetorian @ 14. Dec 2010, 23:57) *
Das BWB hat den 600. und damit letzten KEPD Taurus für die Luftwaffe übernommen.


Wie lange können die eigentlich gelagert werden?
 
Gepard B2L
Beitrag 19. Dec 2010, 16:18 | Beitrag #200
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Hauptmann
Beiträge: 3.574



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 03.01.2002


ZITAT
Kampfhubschrauber Tiger 2012 nach Afghanistan

Berlin - Rund drei Jahre nach Frankreich soll Deutschland 2012 den Kampfhubschrauber Tiger in den Afghanistaneinsatz schicken. Die militärischen Spitzen planten, im zweiten Quartal 2012 vier Tiger an den Hindukusch zu verlegen, schreibt die Zeitung «Die Welt». Sie sollten dort «eine lange beklagte Ausrüstungslücke» schließen. Deutschland hatte bei der EADS-Tochter Eurocopter eine andere, mehr auf die Panzerbekämpfung zugeschnittene Version des Hubschraubers bestellt als die Franzosen.

So, 19. Dez. 2010, 15:44 © Rhein-Zeitung & dpa-infocom
 
MeckieMesser
Beitrag 22. Dec 2010, 18:35 | Beitrag #201
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberleutnant
Beiträge: 1.364



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 10.03.2007


Unabhängig ob Absicht, richtig oder falsch. Aber das kollidiert schon auffällig mit Schwesterwelles Statement vor ein paar Tagen. Also jetzt mal schlicht bezüglich gemeinsamer Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der 2 Ministerien. lol.gif

Der Beitrag wurde von MeckieMesser bearbeitet: 22. Dec 2010, 18:36
 
bill kilgore
Beitrag 22. Dec 2010, 18:45 | Beitrag #202
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Proaktiver Forensupport
Beiträge: 26.779



Gruppe: Admin.WHQ
Mitglied seit: 19.12.2001


ZITAT(MeckieMesser @ 22. Dec 2010, 18:35) *
Unabhängig ob Absicht, richtig oder falsch. Aber das kollidiert schon auffällig mit Schwesterwelles Statement vor ein paar Tagen. Also jetzt mal schlicht bezüglich gemeinsamer Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der 2 Ministerien. lol.gif

Ich wiederhole mich leider, aber solche Begriffe wie "Schwesterwelle" will ich hier nicht mehr sehen. Ist doch kein Kindergarten hier. tock.gif


--------------------
Look into the eyes of a chicken and you will see real stupidity. It is a kind of bottomless stupidity, a fiendish stupidity. They are the most horrifying, cannibalistic and nightmarish creatures in the world.
 
para
Beitrag 23. Dec 2010, 15:29 | Beitrag #203
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Fähnrich
Beiträge: 244



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 15.06.2005


Nachdem sich die Ankuendigungen ueber ein knappes Jahr hinzogen, wurde nun der erste Vertrag zur Entwicklung des indischen T-50/PAKFA-Zweisitzers unterschrieben:

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/article-v...re-fighter.html

ZITAT
India, Russia Sign Contract to Design and Develop FGFA


(Source: India Press Information Bureau; issued Dec. 21, 2010)


The new Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft to be jointly developed by Sukhoi and Hindustan Aeronautics for the Indian air force will be derived from the Sukhoi T-50. (Sukhoi photo)
A contract for Preliminary Design of the Indo-Russian Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft was signed between Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), Rosoboronexport and Sukhoi here today.

...


Indien peilt bisher eine Beschaffung von ca 250 Stueck bis nach 2020 an.
 
goschi
Beitrag 29. Dec 2010, 16:27 | Beitrag #204
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Herr der Dunkelheit
Beiträge: 36.445



Gruppe: Admin.WHQ
Mitglied seit: 21.04.2002


chinesische J-20 ausgelagert


--------------------
Wer zum Denken nachdenkseiten braucht, denkt auch, dass ihm ihm die Tankkarte das tanken abnimmt.

Qui tacet, consentire videtur
ZITAT(Forodir @ 31. May 2023, 20:26) *
Dass die Russen viele Verluste haben aufgrund ihrer offensiven Vorgehensweise, die sie sich bei Zapp Brannigan abgeschaut haben, ist davon unbenommen.
 
Dave76
Beitrag 7. Jan 2011, 18:41 | Beitrag #205
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 15.459



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 13.01.2005


ZITAT
F-35B Put On Probation; New Bomber To Go Forward


Jan 7, 2011

By Bill Sweetman william_sweetman@aviationweek.com
WASHINGTON

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has put the U.S. Marine Corps’ troubled F-35B short-takeoff-and-vertical landing (Stovl) Joint Strike Fighter on “probation,” while endorsing the U.S. Air Force’s long-coveted new bomber program.

The F-35A and F-35C models emerged unscathed from Gates’ review. However, the F-35B “is experiencing significant testing problems,” Gates said at the Pentagon Jan. 6.

Implying that problems are more serious than previously reported, he adds that “these issues may lead to a redesign of the aircraft’s structure and propulsion — changes that could add yet more weight and more cost to an aircraft that has little capacity to absorb more of either.”

The JSF test program will be restructured so that testing of the F-35A and F-35C runs ahead of the B model, rather than the other way around. If the B model cannot be “fixed or gotten back on track” in two years, “I believe it should be canceled,” Gates says.

Gates’ comments came during a press conference announcing a series of budget efficiencies designed to cut or redirect more than $150 billion from current Defense Department spending over the next five years.

Delays to F-35B testing so far — fewer than a dozen vertical landings have been logged since March 2010 — have been publicly attributed to a problem with the auxiliary engine inlet door, and individually minor issues with components such as cooling fans.

More details of changes to the JSF program also emerged, including another delay in the completion of systems development and demonstration (SDD) and a cut-down production ramp. SDD is now delayed to early 2016, versus mid-2015 as planned in the restructuring of the program early last year. SDD finishes with the conclusion of development testing and precedes initial operational testing and evaluation, so the move likely will push initial operational capability (IOC) into 2017. (The individual services are assessing their IOC dates.) This will cost an additional $4.6 billion to the program.

The Fiscal 2012 JSF buy — low-rate initial production (LRIP) Lot V — will be held at 32 aircraft, both to reduce concurrency and because “the final assembly process at Fort Worth is still maturing,” Gates says. Deliveries at this point are late by multiple months.

In Fiscal 2013 and later, deliveries will ramp up by a factor of roughly 1.5 per year, for a total of 325 aircraft through LRIP IX (on contract in 2016 and delivered by 2018) versus 449 in the previous plan.

The LRIP IV contract, just signed, will be changed to eliminate all but three Stovl aircraft. The U.S. will buy only six Stovl aircraft in each of the next two LRIP Lots (V and VI), regarded as the minimum needed to sustain the supplier base and unique skills.

Gates indicated in response to questions that a last-ditch appeal by Marine Commandant Gen. James Amos and his predecessor may have saved the B-model from outright cancellation. Gates said the commandants made a convincing argument for more time to fix the program.

The Navy also plans to acquire more Super Hornets and extend the structural life of 150 “classic” Hornets as a hedge against late JSF deliveries. The service will buy 41 more F/A-18s in Fiscal 2012-14.

Meanwhile, in a major breakthrough for advocates of long-distance airpower, Gates strongly endorsed a program for “a new long-range, nuclear-capable penetrating bomber.” The Air Force has been struggling to get this program reinstated since Gates deferred development of the so-called “2018 bomber” in 2009, against the opposition of some senior Pentagon leaders who argued that smaller unmanned aircraft, plus cruise and ballistic missiles, could adequately supplement existing bombers in the foreseeable future.

Gates also announced decisions on a number of controversial aspects of the new aircraft. It will be nuclear-capable — some had argued for this, on the grounds that radiation-hardening is relatively inexpensive at the design stage and costly to retrofit, while others had opposed it because it brings the bomber within the scope of arms-control discussions. Gates also says that it would be “optionally” piloted rather than unmanned, and that it would make use of existing technologies to speed development.

http://www.aviationweek.com


--------------------
"avenidas/avenidas y flores/flores/flores y mujeres/avenidas/avenidas y mujeres/avenidas y flores y mujeres y/un admirador" - Eugen Gomringer
"Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying." - Arthur C. Clarke
Proud member of Versoffener Sauhaufen™!
#natoforum
 
Gortos
Beitrag 11. Jan 2011, 00:16 | Beitrag #206
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Feldwebel
Beiträge: 392



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 18.07.2008


Wozu eigentlich der 2018 Bomber, kann mir das wer erklären? Vorteile gegenüber der B-2? Billiger, schneller, was auch immer?
 
Dave76
Beitrag 11. Jan 2011, 10:12 | Beitrag #207
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Oberstleutnant
Beiträge: 15.459



Gruppe: VIP
Mitglied seit: 13.01.2005


ZITAT(Gortos @ 11. Jan 2011, 00:16) *
Wozu eigentlich der 2018 Bomber, kann mir das wer erklären? Vorteile gegenüber der B-2? Billiger, schneller, was auch immer?

Wer sagt, dass der '2018 Bomber' die B-2A ersetzen soll? Nach den jetzigen Plänen soll die B-1 bis 2038, die B-2 bis 2040 und die gute alte B-52 sogar bis 2044 im Einsatz bleiben. Auf lange Sicht wird also sowieso eine neue Platform als 'long-range strike weapon' benötigt. Die Frage ist, ob, und in welcher Form, dies das Projekt '2018 Bomber' bewältigen kann. Noch ist nämlich ziemlich unklar, wie genau dieser Bomber überhaupt aussehen soll, somit halte ich auch das 2018-Ziel für ziemlich unrealistisch.


--------------------
"avenidas/avenidas y flores/flores/flores y mujeres/avenidas/avenidas y mujeres/avenidas y flores y mujeres y/un admirador" - Eugen Gomringer
"Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying." - Arthur C. Clarke
Proud member of Versoffener Sauhaufen™!
#natoforum
 
Redskin
Beitrag 11. Jan 2011, 23:13 | Beitrag #208
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Fähnrich
Beiträge: 182



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 10.04.2010


AH-64 bekommt Sensor Upgragde "VNsight"
Lockheed-wins-contract-for-apache-sensor-upgde

Feine Sache, da man jetzt das FLIR (Wärmebild) des M-PNVS mit Restlichttechnik "kombiniert".
VNsight_ProdCard.pdf


--------------------
Never forget that your weapon was made by the lowest bidder
 
bill kilgore
Beitrag 19. Jan 2011, 20:30 | Beitrag #209
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Proaktiver Forensupport
Beiträge: 26.779



Gruppe: Admin.WHQ
Mitglied seit: 19.12.2001


Bei der "Klassiker der Luftfahrt" gibt es einen Versuchsbericht einer Spitfire Mk. V mit DB605 zum Download


--------------------
Look into the eyes of a chicken and you will see real stupidity. It is a kind of bottomless stupidity, a fiendish stupidity. They are the most horrifying, cannibalistic and nightmarish creatures in the world.
 
-WDW-
Beitrag 20. Jan 2011, 17:36 | Beitrag #210
+Quote PostProfile CardPM
Leutnant
Beiträge: 830



Gruppe: Members
Mitglied seit: 28.07.2005


Report Reveals Undisclosed F-35 Problems

The F-35 Lightning II strike fighter has previously undisclosed problems with its handling, avionics, afterburner and helmet-mounted display, according to a report by the Pentagon's Director of Operational Test and Evaluation.

oth the U.S. Air Force F-35A variant and U.S. Marine Corps' F-35B model experienced "transonic wing roll-off, [and] greater than expected sideslip during medium angle-of-attack testing," the report said.

The report also says that various components are not as reliable as expected.

Additionally, the Pratt and Whitney F-135 engine has encountered an afterburner "screech," in which airflow disruptions cause severe vibrations, preventing the engine from reaching maximum power. That problem has delayed some required testing.

According to the report, the program has already begun efforts to fix the problem. Pratt and Whitney officials were not immediately available for comment.

Further, the report indicates problems with the aircraft's helmet-mounted display (HMD). Unlike many previous aircraft, the F-35 does not have a cockpit-mounted head-up display; the pilot instead views critical data projected on the helmet visor.

The report does not elaborate on the nature of the problems, but says they must be solved before the Block 2 mission systems software can be tested. Currently, the program is testing preliminary Block 0.5 and Block 1 mission systems software. Block 2 would incrementally increase the aircraft's capabilities and would be followed by the fully mission-capable Block 3 software.

A Lockheed Martin official could not immediately describe the technical problems with the display.

"The F-35 air system advances Helmet Mounted Display technology to capabilities not flying today on any other tactical platform. With this advancement in technology come challenges that the program is actively managing. The challenges are being worked with the supplier," said Lockheed Martin spokesman John Kent.

"While there are no current plans to change suppliers, options are being considered in parallel that mitigate the most stressing issues. Flight testing is proceeding with the HMD installed and used with no safety of flight concerns."

The report also calls for the Block 3 mission system software to be tested on a simulated battlefield because existing test ranges are not adequate to test the F-35's sensor arrays.

"Open-air testing is constrained by range limitations that are incapable of providing realistic testing of many key capabilities provided by Block 3 aircraft," the report says.

The report also calls for the aircraft's On-Board Inert Gas Generations System, which generates inert gases to prevent oxygen building up inside the fuel tanks, to be redesigned.

"The OBIGGS system fails to inert the fuel tank ullage spaces throughout the combat flight envelopes evaluated," the report says.

The report recommends program officials redesign the OBIGGS system "to ensure that the fuel tank ullage volume oxygen concentrations are maintained below levels that sustain fire and/or explosion throughout the combat flight envelopes."

These issues are in addition to the known difficulties with the B-model aircraft's insufficiently strong structural bulkhead and problems with auxiliary air inlet doors on the aircraft's top surface.

http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=548...c=AME&s=AIR
 
 
 

94 Seiten V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic


4 Besucher lesen dieses Thema (Gäste: 4 | Anonyme Besucher: 0)
0 Mitglieder:




Vereinfachte Darstellung Aktuelles Datum: 26. April 2024 - 06:32